I've seen no evidence that the unsourced BLPs are more prone to subtle vandalism at the time of creation than the sourced ones.
If it's unsubtle vandalism, speedy already takes care of it just fine. If it happens later, this proposal doesn't do any good towards solving the problem. Maybe there will be a miracle, and flagged revisions will actually prove workable. On 4/1/09, geni <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/4/1 doc <[email protected]>: >> Is it perhaps time, that we started to demand that basic sourcing was a >> pre-requisite of creating an article on any living person? > > Nope. Reason being that sourcing is no more than a sop to the media to > pretend we are doing something. > > > -- > geni > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > -- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
