Charles Matthews <[email protected]> wrote: > Traditionally, though, the problem has been underestimated. One need not > adopt the language of "regulatory capture", as David Gerard does, to > look the issues in the eye:
Ah, but that you do now look such things in the eye - is it not due in some large part to David's insightful if not directly relevant choice of conceptualization? > (1) There is actually no substantive consensus position that uncivil > editors are a net negative to the site; Are there any data on this - whether or not Wikipedia has a shortage of *dicks,* and whether efforts to enlist more might improve overall reliability? - Stevertigo _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
