Elimino la parte principale del messaggio per chiedere un chiarimento su questo punto: non so da dove vengano tali cifre, ma Risker suggerisce che en.wiki grazie ai vari strumenti per il contrasto del vandalismo («Huggle, Twinkle, Friendly, the edit filters, reverting bots») ci sia molto meno da fare (nel senso che si è piú efficienti) e centinaia di utenti di en.wiki abbiano potuto dedicarsi ad altro. A parte le cifre esatte, io non ho mai capito perché in it.wiki non si usa (quasi) nulla di tutto ciò. Qualcuno me lo sa spiegare?
Nemo -------- Messaggio Originale -------- Oggetto: [Foundation-l] Differences between projects with common versus highly diverse cultural backgrounds (was Re: Pending Changes) Data: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:49:36 -0400 Da: Risker [...] Indeed, the number of de:WP editors with >100 edits/month has remained very stable since January 2006. (The number of en:WP editors was essentially the same in January 2006 as at present, but hit its peak in April 2007. Let's not cherry pick the data too much, okay?) As an aside for those interested in the historical perspective, the massive increase in the number of editors on en:WP coincides with a massive influx of vandalism, and over a thousand editors did almost nothing *but* revert or otherwise address vandalism. As better and more effective tools have been developed to address that problem - Huggle, Twinkle, Friendly, the edit filters, reverting bots, semi-protection, etc - the number of editors needed to manage vandalism has diminished dramatically. In other words, that 1300-editor difference may largely be accounted for because those whose only skill was vandal-fighting have moved on. That's not to say there is no vandalism on en:WP today; there's still plenty of it. [...] _______________________________________________ WikiIT-l mailing list [email protected] Pagina per iscriversi/disiscriversi: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiit-l
