I believe the best way to avoid this kind of situation in the future, is to 
have tags specifically to indicate a need for personal space or something.

From what I have read so far, Romaine has done nothing "out of the ordinary" 
(based on my cultural perspective); and he doesn't deserve this kind of 
treatment/sanction/punishment/etc.

I should also state that I have met Romaine a couple of times, and he is indeed 
a very nice man, who always means the best.

Sam.

On 25 Jul 2018 16:41, Deryck Chan <deryckc...@gmail.com> wrote:
This is the second time I remember that the Friendly Space Policy was invoked 
to remove a Wikimania attendee from a situation, presumably because of 
in-person misconduct on their part, where the removal was made public but the 
reason of removal was kept secret.

The problem with such secretive invocations of Friendly Space is that it is 
very difficult, as Reem and others have pointed out, to not see this as a 
punishment.

I understand that it is very difficult to balance the specific, personal 
sensitivities and cultural preferences of several hundred people from different 
cultures. But as this discussion has shown, it is counter-productive to use 
Friendly Space this way, because other Wikimaniacs are left worrying what the 
appropriate behaviour is supposed to be.

I don't know the details of this incident because it wasn't public. But from 
what I know of Romaine from previous Wikimanias, I'm disappointed that this 
incident couldn't have been handled behind the scenes with T&S and the people 
involved. The fact that Romaine felt the need to go public about his removal as 
an organiser showed mis-handling of process.

Well, actually the previous time was 6 years ago, so maybe we're doing well. We 
did try reforming the friendly space policy around 2013-14 but couldn't agree 
on something better at the time... The doors of improvement always stay open 
for the Wikimedia movement.

--Deryck

On 20 July 2018 at 11:28, James Alexander 
<jalexan...@wikimedia.org<mailto:jalexan...@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
Hey all,

I am, as always, sorry, that this has spilled out into the public sphere more I 
do not think that is ever a good thing as discussion of specific situations 
like this only serves to increase discomfort, make people feel even less safe 
and make victims of everyone.

Event Safety and Friendly Spaces is a top priority of any conference whether 
big or small as well as one of the issues that can be most difficult to deal 
with since it is always a balance of situations, feelings and people who are 
frequently acting in good faith. I can confirm that Trust & Safety was involved 
here and, like most people who are working on Friendly Spaces, we never aim to 
take serious actions if we are able to avoid it. Most issues are dealt with by 
local attendees or organizing volunteers with only short reminders or chats and 
escalate from there only as things become more serious or repetitive. The same 
is true for T&S who generally doesn't even become involved until it is a larger 
situation. I will admit that whenever a local organizer or volunteer is 
involved the seriousness is increased some because they are, rightly or 
wrongly, seen as in a position of influence and power which amplifies any and 
all issues that arise. It does not, however, change the focus of trying to take 
the least amount of actions possible.

I will be the first to admit (and did when talking to Romaine yesterday) that 
he has done an enormous amount of great work for events and nothing we did was 
meant to demean that even if it felt that way to Romaine. Like any Friendly 
Spaces actions nothing we did was meant as a punishment (even though, again, I 
understand it can feel that way) but was done because we felt they were the 
best thing to do for event safety. I can certainly guarantee that the decision 
was not taken lightly.

As many have noted the entire story is not out in the open and, honestly, won't 
be. I know that won't make everyone happy but unfortunately is almost always 
going to be the case for specific cases. If you want to speak about process 
questions and the like, the team (including myself) is certainly willing to do 
so. We have a table on the 2nd floor or you can grab one of us around the 
conference.

James

James Alexander
Manager, Trust & Safety (Operations)
Wikimedia Foundation



_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l

Reply via email to