Another option is to create a Cascadia Wikimedians page at English Wikipedia. It might get more traffic and participation than the Meta pages. But, of course, this would just be one more page to manage. I would only recommend creating it if we think much of our activities will be centered around ENWP and if we think it would invite more participation. If we do want a page at ENWP (of course I am talking about a project page, not a Wikipedia article), I'd be happy to get one started.
Jason On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Benj. Mako Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings Pine! > > <quote who="Pine W" date="Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 01:28:10AM -0800"> > > However, if anyone has spare time to do things like set up websites > > and bank accounts, please let me know. > > I'm happy to set up a website. What sort of thing were you thinking? > > It seems that lots of usergroups use their pages in meta as their main > websites. Sometimes, groups have a prettier page on a domain that > highlights some recent events and points there. I've hesitant to > create a special website that we then need to maintain unless it's > solving a problem. :) > > Later, > Mako > > > -- > Benjamin Mako Hill > http://mako.cc/ > > Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far > as society is free to use the results. --GNU Manifesto > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-Cascadia mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-cascadia > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-Cascadia mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-cascadia
