Am 12. April 2012 20:26 schrieb Samuel Klein <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Casey Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Mark Jaroski <[email protected]> wrote: >>> We're under the impression that there are >>> other Wikimedia foundation projects which don't use NPOV, and so those of >>> us favouring approaching WMF have been able to argue that we wouldn't be >>> forced to use it. If that's wrong then we should probably just give up this >>> line of exploration and go find another solution. >> >> My impression of sister projects is the same. Not all of the same >> rules that apply to Wikipedia also apply to sister projects. With the >> exception of very few mandatory things (like respect for information >> about living persons), individual projects can determine their own >> rules and policies as much as they want. > > That's my view as well. SJ
I beg to differ, and I would like to repeat a point that I had raised on Meta yesterday. I think we all agree that travel guides are all about POV? Choose this hotel, while better keep away from that one is a case in point. This would hardly go with any guideline for neutrality of sorts. Such information should indeed be excluded. If a travel guide is part of Wikimedia it should include verifiable information only. This excludes any recommendations that are not well-based on facts. In Wikimedia projects we deal with facts. That's what makes our credibility. Regards, Jürgen. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
