For clarity, by verifiability of sources, what I meant was "we know where this image came from and know it's freely licensed" - nothing beyond that
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Kevin Gorman <[email protected]> wrote: > Commons has a policy dealing with neutrality, but it's very different > than that of, say, the Wikipedias - and is I would think even less > strict than what could reasonably be formulated for a travel guide. > They also have no policy on verifiability, except for requiring > verifiability of sources. Wikiversity doesn't require NPOV on all of > their content pages. I'm sure there are other WMF websites that do > not require NPOVness or verifiability. > > I do not think NPOV/verifiability issues are at all a problem in > accepting a travel site in to the WMF fold - although it would be good > perhaps if they start citing the history sections. I think a travel > guide fits in with the aims of the WMF, and I think that there would > be beneficial synergy between the existing travel guide community and > the existing Wikimedia community. > > ---- > Kevin Gorman > user:kgorman-ucb _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
