Hoi,
It is not.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 13 April 2012 11:46, Mark Jaroski <mark.jaro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:40, Juergen Fenn
> <schneeschme...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
> > I beg to differ, and I would like to repeat a point that I had raised
> > on Meta yesterday. I think we all agree that travel guides are all
> > about POV? Choose this hotel, while better keep away from that one is
> > a case in point. This would hardly go with any guideline for
> > neutrality of sorts. Such information should indeed be excluded. If a
> > travel guide is part of Wikimedia it should include verifiable
> > information only. This excludes any recommendations that are not
> > well-based on facts. In Wikimedia projects we deal with facts. That's
> > what makes our credibility.
>
>
> Well, I guess if that turns out to be the consensus view then we'll have to
> look for a different solution.
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
