If the conflict was primarily with MZMcBride (which seems to be the case), then it was a bit cowardly to overhaul the entire scheme on the site in order to avoid telling him to knock it off.
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Mono <monom...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's been a long-term conflict with volunteers & staff on > wikimediafoundation.org. As a user, I understand. Each staff member likes > to keep everything their way. They frequently revert changes (take a look > at the discussion and user talk pages, especially for MZMcBride) on 'staff > authority'. This is a logical next step against these users (most likely > MZ) so there's no conflict. > > Is this a bad thing? Most likely not. Is the reason behind it a bad thing? > Yes. > > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
