On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 5:07 PM, MZMcBride <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Mono <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's been a long-term conflict with volunteers & staff on > > wikimediafoundation.org. As a user, I understand. Each staff member > likes > > to keep everything their way. They frequently revert changes (take a look > > at the discussion and user talk pages, especially for MZMcBride) on > 'staff > > authority'. This is a logical next step against these users (most likely > > MZ) so there's no conflict. > > > > Is this a bad thing? Most likely not. Is the reason behind it a bad > thing? > > Yes. Nathan wrote: >> >If the conflict was primarily with MZMcBride (which seems to be the >> >case), then it was a bit cowardly to overhaul the entire scheme on the >> >site in order to avoid telling him to knock it off. >> >>> What'd I do? >>> MZMcBride >> >> MZMcBride, when I originally wrote this I was referencing nothing in particular. I was just observing a pattern of reversions and conflicts between you, me, staff & others. Looking at the history of your talk page on wmfwiki (and mine), this can be found. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
