Well, we were discussing IRC and my experience there in this thread,
and many people were asking me to "wait." I find this interesting,
because some on Wikipediocracy also asked me to "wait," with the
significant exception that this was to "wait until I so something,
then come back." In this case, it was "wait until you've read these
articles and seen this stuff on-wiki, then come back." I agreed. They
then checked in with me regularly (I think most of them thought I was
going to bail), and once I had read the material I had agreed to read,
we resumed the discussion. It's all here: It's all here on this
thread: http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=4531

But I think I've figured out a way for me to bring up topics without
worrying about my level of experience with Wikipedia/Wikimedia. I'll
start a new thread with my concerns and what I've come up with.

,Wil

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Martijn Hoekstra
<martijnhoeks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> We are all interested in hearing all sides of every story here, aren't
>> we? I'm starting to get the feeling that there are things that some
>> people on this list don't want *anyone* to discuss.
>
>
> Which things, and which people are you aiming at, particularly?
>
> --Martijn
>
>
>> After all, you
>> could simply ignore my messages or even filter them from your inbox,
>> if you are so inclined. This impression has been troubling me greatly.
>> Do you know that this is *precisely* what many on Wikipediocracy are
>> saying about this list? Are they right?
>>
>> ,Wil
>>
>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Wil Sinclair <w...@wllm.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks, I wasn't aware I could do this. I'm assuming that it would be
>> >> obvious who was an employee at Wikimedia in the log, too. I posted the
>> >> following to Wikipediocracy a few minutes ago:
>> >>
>> >> "
>> >> I may have misread which page the rev was on, or I misunderstood the
>> >> person who said s/he revdeleted it in thinking that it had been
>> >> revdeleted in the previous few minutes. This is exactly why I prefer
>> >> public recorded forums. Now no one can go back to clear up the
>> >> confusion. For all I know, I might have to apologize for a
>> >> misunderstanding, and it would really suck if I somehow misrepresented
>> >> things and didn't have any opportunity to straighten things out.
>> >>
>> >> Of course, it is entirely on me. I knew that the IRC channels weren't
>> >> logged, and that it was a bannable offense to log them (for those who
>> >> aren't familiar with IRC, this essentially means that you aren't
>> >> supposed to save conversations there; in most channels that's A-OK,
>> >> but on all of the most used wikipedia channels it seems to be
>> >> disallowed). Next time I have a concern, I will take it to wikimedia-l
>> >> or one of the other mailing lists. As this example also shows, one
>> >> can't be sure that the revs on a page within Wikimedia's wikis
>> >> themselves won't be redacted after-the-fact. I'm not expressing an
>> >> opinion about whether stuff should be redacted or on what grounds, but
>> >> I am asserting that it is possible to do so.
>> >> "
>> >>
>> >> There is a discussion about this issue there, as well. It can be
>> >> followed at the link I posted earlier. Here's the last page of the
>> >> discussion that includes the comment above:
>> >>
>> http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=4680&p=96600#p96600
>> >>
>> >> ,Wil
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hi Wil,
>> >
>> > This is exactly why others have suggested that you slow down, and focus
>> on
>> > learning the basics of the Wikimedia projects and movements before
>> jumping
>> > into the hottest, most controversial issues. It takes time to develop the
>> > understanding necessary to draw conclusions, especially in areas most
>> > likely to erupt into drama and heated exchanges.
>> >
>> > To wit, I don't believe it can even be determined if someone is logging a
>> > channel, and many people (including Wikimedians) log all of their
>> channels.
>> > Several Wikimedia-related channels are publicly logged. Other channels
>> > prohibit people from publishing logs.
>> >
>> > It's also quite common knowledge that revisions can be deleted (by any
>> > administrator, where they remain viewable by administrators) or
>> suppressed
>> > altogether (by users with Oversight rights). I think if you considered it
>> > with a full possession of the facts, you would agree that this is good
>> and
>> > necessary.
>> >
>> > In any case, thank you Lila for your note! I appreciate that you have
>> made
>> > it clear you've seen the threads of the last few weeks and understand the
>> > concerns that posters have described.
>> >
>> > ~Nathan
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/guidelineswikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org>
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to