Hoi,
There should not be separate standards for Commons and any Wikipedia is
surely what you mean...
Thanks,
GerardM
On 4 June 2014 22:17, ENWP Pine <[email protected]> wrote:
> Asaf, I agree in some ways. ENWP's email list is a backwater though, and
> since the discussion that got me thinking about this issue started on this
> list it made sense to me to keep it on this list. Also, other wikis'
> experiences with VE are relevant. My personal experience with VE has most
> recently been on Meta. Also, you may remember that I suggested that a
> recent and much more intensive discussion about Commons would have been
> better elsewhere than this list, but a lot of it stayed here. The volume of
> this conversation about VE is pretty low. There should be a single standard
> on this list, not separate standards for Commons and ENWP.
>
> However, I agree that we don't need to keep this conversation here. Risker
> and anyone else who's interested, please continue on my ENWP talk page or
> start a thread somewhere like VP-T.
>
> Pine
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
