... but the conference has been running for a few years, and has gradually
evolved over that time, from primarily chapters, to other affiliate
organisations, AffCom itself, FDC in recent years, etc.  I don't think
anyone is suggesting any revolutionary changes for the next one?  Just a
change in name to suit the current audience.

What's the problem with the name "Wikimedia" being used?  It is, after all,
a conference involving Wikimedians.  It appears the main complaint is the
over-generic title "Wikimedia Conference".

Charles (User:Chuq)

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Richard Symonds <
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:

> What I'm saying is, let's plan a conference before we argue over the name.
> On 12 Sep 2014 00:57, "Risker" <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We do have a community centre.  It's called Meta.  It may not be a very
> > elegant one, and there are definitely parts that can be improved, but
> it's
> > our virtual community centre.
> >
> > Risker/Anne
> >
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Reply via email to