... but the conference has been running for a few years, and has gradually evolved over that time, from primarily chapters, to other affiliate organisations, AffCom itself, FDC in recent years, etc. I don't think anyone is suggesting any revolutionary changes for the next one? Just a change in name to suit the current audience.
What's the problem with the name "Wikimedia" being used? It is, after all, a conference involving Wikimedians. It appears the main complaint is the over-generic title "Wikimedia Conference". Charles (User:Chuq) On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Richard Symonds < richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > What I'm saying is, let's plan a conference before we argue over the name. > On 12 Sep 2014 00:57, "Risker" <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We do have a community centre. It's called Meta. It may not be a very > > elegant one, and there are definitely parts that can be improved, but > it's > > our virtual community centre. > > > > Risker/Anne > > > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
