2014-11-24 13:44 GMT+01:00 Ilario Valdelli <valde...@gmail.com>:
> The problem is that any change means "change management".

But who was it that authorised which change? I would like to focus on
what makes sense, which means that any technocratic category just
won't lead us anywhere. In the end, what once was referred to as the
Wikimedia movement has become a strange lot of organisations that have
lost contact with the community of editors. The only thing that keeps
them together in the end is money -- which is a bourgeois trade of
old. And isn't it ironic that at a time when the German chapter
understood that it had to intensify links with the community and
partly already succeeded in getting back on track it is given less
money, severing the chapter from its peers. That's no way still to
empower the remaining editing community which is best served locally.
Cutting the local chapters short and poor results in less support for
editors, of course.

Regards,
Jürgen.

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to