On 20 January 2015 at 18:23, Trillium Corsage <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thank you for informing me my opinion is wrong, but I'd appreciate > specific refutation next time. The answer "dig through the logs and > archives" will find no doubt many criticisms of Russavia including from > many rabid and shifty accusers and drama mongers, but won't tell one why > the WMF acted. "Do some homework and figure it out yourself" is no answer > for an 100 million dollar organization with scores of employees to say. > I'm not a 100 million dollar organisation but in any case we have further established that your interest is not in fact openness. > You seem to have misread what I said. In such a case, the WMF could advise > the editor of all that privately, > No. Your problem is that you are assuming internal WMF communications are privileged (note this term has a very precise legal meaning and that is the way I'm using it). -- geni _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
