perhaps you're right. But keep in mind that the FDC has been set up
specifically as a committee advising the Board in this specific area, and
is composed of people with particular competence in finance, grants, etc.
Whichever body is chosen though, a longer feedback/comment period is



On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Pine W <> wrote:

> It does make sense to me that there would be at least a month between
> publication of the full draft plan, including the documentation that
> requested, and the closure of the comment period.
> In its current form the plan is too vague for me to support it as written.
> I think that the WMF audit committee or the WMF Board might be in a better
> position than the FDC to do a thorough review of the plan, including
> holding public Hangout meetings in which the plan is discussed, much like
> how government legislative bodies review proposed budgets in public. This
> would increase public confidence in the quality of the plan.
> Regards,
> Pine
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> Unsubscribe:,
> <>


prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i centrum badawczego CROW
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego

członek Akademii Młodych Uczonych Polskiej Akademii Nauk
członek Komitetu Polityki Naukowej MNiSW

Wyszła pierwsza na świecie etnografia Wikipedii "Common Knowledge? An
Ethnography of Wikipedia" (2014, Stanford University Press) mojego

Pacific Standard:
The Wikipedian:
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:

Reply via email to