On 27 November 2015 at 15:27, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Would it not make more sense to import (and verify!) the reliable source
> cited in the relevant Wikipedia version, along with the statement?
>
>
You hit issues with non machine readable data, paywalls and deadtree walls.
And even then it varies by field (for example in chemistry if you can get
around those problems you wouldn't bother with wikidata and instead go
straight for the Beilstein clone).

-- 
geni
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to