When you do that all your data is removed and you are banned from Wikidata.
On 29 November 2015 at 11:40, Lilburne <lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net> wrote:
> On 29/11/2015 00:37, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>> It was from the Myanmar WIkipedia that a lot of data was imported to
>> Wikidata. Data that did not exist elsewhere. I do not care really what
>> "Freedom House" says. I do not know them, I do know that the data is
>> relevant and useful It was even the subject on a blogpost..
>> You may ignore data that is not from a source that you like. This
>> indiscriminate POV is not a NPOV.
> Isn't the point that the data was taken primarily because it was
> available, and that
> there was no attempt to verify its accuracy. If I give you 10,000 images
> of lichen but
> before hand randomly switch the names of 2000 of them and add misleading
> randomly to another 2000 are the images useful as data? Would including
> improve NPOV?
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: