There are certain things that affect many volunteers
directly. A slightly off-topic example:
The fact that:
> "the WMF education team has no engineering resources"
Craig Franklin <cfrank...@halonetwork.net> writes:
> You're correct in that most volunteers don't care directly. The problem is
> that a lot of the BoT's recent difficulties have crossed the line from
> "angry encyclopedia people venting on a mailing list" to "serious and
> negative attention from the mainstream press". If there is too much of the
> latter, it may create a perception amongst the general public than even if
> Wikipedia is a useful resource, that it is incompetent with handling
> money. As a result, donations dry up, and difficult and unpleasant choices
> have to be made around budget.
> So yes, this sort of thing can influence rank and file editors most
> seriously, albeit indirectly.
> On 19 February 2016 at 07:52, Yaroslav M. Blanter <pute...@mccme.ru> wrote:
>> To be honest, most volunteers do not care. We understand of course that if
>> things would go really wrong, for example, servers stop running, or money
>> runs out and ads are introduced, or English Wikipedia admins continue
>> resigning/being desysopped without proper replacement, so that we have ten
>> active admins, then we are in serious trouble. But as far as things are
>> running quasi-normal, we just continue. I was making 50 to 100 edits per
>> day five years ago, I am making 50 to 100 edits per day now, I will
>> probably still be making 50 to 100 edits per day in five years, unless I
>> die or leave because of a serious demotivation - and this demotivation is
>> unlikely to be related to WMF. I think staff are way more vulnerable to all
>> kinds of events.
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe:
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com