On 22 February 2016 at 01:06, Pete Forsyth <[email protected]> wrote:
> The discussion about post-mortems arose rather organically, not as a result > of a decision to use a certain medium. The participants were: Jonathan > Cardy, Erik Möller, Dariusz Jemielniak, myself, Ben Creasy, Asaf Bartov, > Jon Beasley-Murray, Bence Damakos, Luis Villa, Eddie Erhart, Liam Wyatt, > and Tisza Gergő. I think it is fair to say that we had a general consensus > that: > > When something does not go well (for instance, various software releases), > it would be highly valuable for the Wikimedia Foundation's senior > leadership to prioritize creating a thoughtful and official post-mortem > document and discussion. > So they want there to be even more incentives for the foundation never to admit failure? -- geni _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
