There's a difference between "does the WMF generally include non-disparagement and non-disclosure clauses in separation agreements" and "how many separation agreements include non-disparagement and non-disclosure clauses". One is general, and the other is specific; the first can likely be answered, but the second is getting into "personal information" territory. While I know there has been a definite and reasonable concern about the frequency and nature of departures over the last several months, we are still talking about a small number of very publicly identified individuals.
Just as importantly, those clauses tend to go both ways - in that the WMF may also be bound not to disclose them too, as part of the individual separation agreements. They tend to be built right into some employment contracts with 'golden parachute' clauses, for example. As well, separation agreements are much less common when people resign as opposed to - shall we say - being monetarily urged to look for other opportunities elsewhere; identifying the actual number may reveal the circumstances under which some people left the organization, which can have a serious impact on their future earnings and ability to secure future employment. Risker/Anne On 14 March 2016 at 13:37, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > We need to distinguish between the personal and private details of > individuals and the policies of the WMF around management of employees. It > should be clear to everyone that employee satisfaction, retention, dispute > management and other issues of personnel management are central to the > controversies of the last few months. It's disingenuous to argue that these > matters must all be off-limits for public discussion simply because they > fall under the umbrella of "HR." Having said that... > > The names of the people who have left may be public; whether they accepted > a severance package or not obviously is not and should not be publicized > except willingly by them. It is relevant and useful information for the > rest of us to understand if severance agreements have been packaged with > non-disparagement clauses that could prevent negative but highly topical > and timely information from being released. We can probably infer that this > is the case from the profound silence emanating from most departed > employees, but it would be nice to know for sure if money and benefits were > used to insulate Lila or others from the effects of serious mismanagement. > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Risker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Actually, no, you probably can't ask that question either - because the > > names of the individuals who have departed are pretty much all publicly > > known. (There's even a timeline in which all their names are mentioned, > > linked from news articles and other "external" locations.) In many > > jurisdictions, it is potentially illegal for employers to disclose such > > information; many would feel it unethical for an employer to disclose the > > departure conditions absent a mutual agreement between the employer and > the > > departed. California human resources law would allow for a civil suit > that > > could result in a large settlement, either individually or as a group > > (think high-tech employees lawsuit). This is an area where > "transparency" > > very definitely intersects with the privacy rights of those individuals > who > > are directly affected. Privacy should win. > > > > Risker/Anne > > > > On 14 March 2016 at 12:50, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It's an easy question to ask in a non-specific way: > > > > > > In the last six months, has the WMF approved severance agreements with > > > departing employees with language that, in effect, prevented them from > > > publicly criticizing the WMF, its management or the Board on matters of > > > public interest? > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > > > New messages to: [email protected] > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > > New messages to: [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
