On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Luis Villa <l...@lu.is> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 1:08 PM Antoine Musso <hashar+...@free.fr> wrote: > >> >> To the best of my knowledge such agreements are not public, but honestly >> there is no conspiracy behind that. There are public clues though: >> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Access_to_nonpublic_information_policy >> https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitech:Labs_Terms_of_use >> Others at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal#Policies >> > > In mid-2013, the legal team put the standard employee NDA clauses, and a > couple others, on-wiki at: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreements#Wikimedia_Foundation.27s_non-disclosure_agreements > > Luis
Thanks Luis! It looks like the non-disparagement clause has now been removed, which is nice. I'm not sure how new NDAs change the status of people who signed old versions, of course. > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
