Den 2016-04-09 kl. 12:51, skrev Fæ:
Yes, another option to secure a continuity of members in the board would
be to accept resignations will occur and then have the community
election to end formally in a number of "reserves". and that these
reserves are to be elected by the Board if resignation occurs.
As the community election today only gives three candidates for the
Board to elect (or reject), the number four must be seen as a runner up,
to be selected by the Board if they do not approve any of the first
three. This reasoning was also reflected in the stating by the election
community in early January and the election of Maria as a replacement
for James by the Board. To extend the same reasoning this time is
stretching it a bit far, time since last election is further away, and
number five in the election has at least by me never been seen as a
runnerup. If the Board in their selection after a community election
were to reject two candidates I would consider a reelection more
relevant then to go further down the list .
leaving your seat should be made to appear like a
royal abdication or the result of failure.
But a bylection is quite costly to set up and run centrally and also for
the whole community. So perhaps we should be broadminded in thinking how
could fill the empty seat after Danny
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org