We are likely to eventually have a similar situation in my region of the 
Russian Federation & we welcome this.

1) A recently recognized Wikimedia Community of Tatar language User Group (WUG 
TAT) is a language-oriented UG without geographical borders.
2) At the same time, we will eventually need a Tatarstan-centered Wikimedia 
User Group / Subnational Thematic organization without specific language focus.

I am actually in the process of laying the ground for the second. During 
https://ru.wikimedia.org/wiki/Умный_регион/05.02.2019/en I was given less than 
a minute, but still managed to convince both Federal Deputy Prime-Minister and 
Regional President. I will have to craft value proposition statements & 
roadmaps in a way as to try have this implemented first in my Republic, then 
across Russia.

farhad

-- 
Farkhad Fatkullin - Фархад Фаткуллин http://sikzn.ru/ Тел.+79274158066 / 
skype:frhdkazan / Wikipedia:frhdkazan


06.02.2019, 21:02, "Alessandro Marchetti via Wikimedia-l" 
<wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>:
>  I guess... probably one include also the majority of Kosovo, 
> Albanian-speaking regions of Greece, P.Y.R.O.M./North Macedonia and maybe 
> even Southern Italy and the other one is just centered on Albania as a state. 
> This is not the same scenario as Brazil (not sure if, partially, also Greece) 
> since in that case we had two group precisely centered on one country.
>
> It's not totally practical but the geopolitical situation is not practical in 
> the end by itself...  You cannot force people to get rid of a group that 
> might become a future national chapter because their language is spoken by 
> many other people in neighboring countries who already clustered in a  
> previous UG. So it should not be considered a critical situation per se, 
> although the interaction of the two UGs should be closely monitored and 
> addressed since the beginning.
>
> What is missing is a precise guideline or attention to UG related to 
> languages (of minorities or globally spoken). You could have the same problem 
> with a future Italian minor languages UG active in Corsica or Croatia, with a 
> Retho-romance Alpine language user group, with a gender gap UG active in a 
> language distributed along various borders... and so on. They don't seem to 
> show huge problems when similar situation exist in reality but they could 
> degenerate, stop cooperation, or never start it with other UGs or national 
> chapters.
> I value plurality, I want UG to be created and catalyze activities, and I 
> think that the problem is mostly the character of people. However, I strongly 
> advocate a more structured architecture of language-based UG to be 
> implemented. Basically what I suppose was done with Catalan Wikimedia 
> Thematic Organization, although in that case there is no main entity 
> competing on the area of a sovereign country where Catalan is spoken (which 
> is not necessarily a better scenario, just complex in a different way). We 
> call them almost all "User groups" but they are sometimes local geographical 
> unions of users and volunteers (embryonic future national chapters or just 
> regional associations), language-oriented associations created to involve 
> minorities or cross-projects of interested users unified by a topic. They all 
> have different purpose and should be rationalized somehow. I think I pushed a 
> little bit in that direction on the application to WikiSummit, stressing the 
> importance to make order in the field.
> IMHO, we should have single-language thematic organizations (specifically for 
> a language), cross-language thematic organization or local UG centered on a 
> vague historic geographical area or a very precise administrative one. And 
> think carefully about their status. This is however just a vague idea.
>
> Alessandro
>    Il mercoledì 6 febbraio 2019, 18:11:57 CET, Philip Kopetzky 
> <philip.kopet...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>  Just to close off this thread, there seemingly is no plan and others are
> left to deal with the fallout of this decision.
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 08:23, Paulo Santos Perneta <paulospern...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Kirill,
>>
>>  I join Philip and Mardetanha on their concerns and questions. Having
>>  followed closely the Brazil situation - which ended up in the worst
>>  possible way, IMO - I'm very interested in your answer.
>>
>>  Best,
>>
>>  Paulo
>>
>>  2018-06-11 13:07 GMT+01:00 Mardetanha <mardetanha.w...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>>  ​ Hi Kirill
>>>
>>>   Philip's concerns were not answered, would you please respond, I had the
>>>  very same question.
>>>
>>>  Mardetanha
>>>
>>>  On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Philip Kopetzky <
>>>  philip.kopet...@gmail.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>  > Hi Kirill,
>>>  >
>>>  > what's the difference/relationship between this group and the
>>>  Wikimedians
>>>  > of Albanian Language User Group, which is currently applying for a
>>>  > simpleAPG grant? How do we avoid creating more Brazilian scenarios by
>>>  > reconising even more user groups from the same area?
>>>  >
>>>  > Best,
>>>  > Philip
>>>  >
>>>  > On 22 May 2018 at 22:07, Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>  >
>>>  > > Hi everyone!
>>>  > >
>>>  > > I'm very happy to announce that the Affiliations Committee has
>>>  recognized
>>>  > > [1] Wikimedia Community User Group Albania [2] as a Wikimedia User
>>>  Group.
>>>  > > The group aims to improve content about Albania across the Wikimedia
>>>  > > projects, including Commons and Wikidata, and to collaborate with
>>>  other
>>>  > > Wikimedia user groups, chapters, and other free culture groups in
>>>  Albania
>>>  > > and across the region.
>>>  > >
>>>  > > Please join me in congratulating the members of this new user group!
>>>  > >
>>>  > > Regards,
>>>  > > Kirill Lokshin
>>>  > > Chair, Affiliations Committee
>>>  > >
>>>  > > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/
>>>  > > Resolutions/Recognition_Wikimedia_Community_User_Group_Albania
>>>  > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_User_
>>>  > Group_Albania
>>>  > >
>>>  > > _______________________________________________
>>>  > > Affiliates mailing list
>>>  > > affilia...@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>  > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/affiliates
>>>  > >
>>>  > >
>>>  > _______________________________________________
>>>  > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>>>  > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>>>  > wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>  > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>  > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>  > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>>  >
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>  New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>  <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Affiliates mailing list
>>  affilia...@lists.wikimedia.org
>>  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/affiliates
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to