We just had an RfC on Meta which gave 90% opposes. I do not see how any serious rebranding discussions could still be happening after this result has become apparent. For me personally, the question is closed at least for several years.
Best Yaroslav On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:48 PM Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Although Mike and I have differences of opinion about centralizing on > the "Wikipedia" brand, one way in which I agree with Mike is that > there are ways to have branding discussions that are not themselves > controversial. Even if consensus was not reached, I for one would be > more accepting of the process. > > Some departments in WMF seem to be more on board with regards to > process than others. In particular, I think that Audiences these days > generally does a good job, and also I like Tech News. > > Outside of WMF, the Wikidata team at WMDE produces very informative > newsletters each week. They seem to do good work without spending > money on outside consultants. > > So, why all of these issues in WMF Communications? I don't get it. > > Pine > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine ) > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>