I was more interested in seeing if this could be enforced by technology, maybe so that unconfirmed users simply didn't get an "edit" button on other name spaces.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:08 PM, private musings <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Michelle, > > We could certainly try that as a matter of policy - as in, simply > communicating that rule clearly to all comers - I'd happily be > prepared to do some of the legwork in explaining how that works to > would be editors. Probably it would work better in tandem with > continuing the restriction on editing to registered accounts - and > only registering accounts upon application - what do you think of > those restrictions? > > cheers, > > Peter, > PM. > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Michelle Gallaway <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm not exactly sure how a lot of these things work, but would it be > > possible to allow open editing in only the talk namespaces, but not > anywhere > > else? That way the members could have their private space, and the > peanut > > gallery is kept from interfering but can still participate to a limited > > degree. > > > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Adam Jenkins <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Peter! > >> > >> It's been raised, and I think it is still generally seen as a really > >> good idea. However, at the moment we've been focused on some > >> priorities related to privacy policies and PayPal, so we haven't been > >> focused on this topic yet. I'll see if I can add it to the agenda for > >> the next meeting, at least for discussion, and I'll report back. :) > >> > >> Adam. > >> > >> > >> On 3 December 2010 09:53, private musings <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > I was just wondering if anything happened on this front? - It'd be > >> > great to somehow open some aspects of WMAU up - ideally as soon as > >> > possible! - are the committee discussing things further? (if so, > >> > please just consider doing something - or at least discussing openly > >> > :-) - pretty much any model which opens things in any way would be a > >> > step forward in my view, and I think encouraging and facilitating > >> > greater engagement (which a more open wiki would help, in my view) is > >> > very important, > >> > > >> > cheers, > >> > > >> > Peter, > >> > PM. > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Wikimediaau-l mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikimediaau-l mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimediaau-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaau-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
