At 10:23 -0800 11/1/09, AndrewRT wrote: >On Jan 10, 10:56 am, Gordon Joly <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> How does that sound? Complicated... > >Can you suggest any ways of making it simpler? > > > ...and the competitor cannot control >> "stage 2". So it is no longer a scavenger hunt at that stage, > >Yes, I spoke to Pharos about this previously - he though it would be >best to keep the competition restricted to stage 1. Stage 2 is still >important of course otherwise wikipedia doesn't get to benefit from >the photos and everyone is welcome to join in! > >> there >> may be wrangling... if the other parties don't like the images (not >> the judges). > >Yes - that's the main reason why Pharos thought it best not to have >the competetion at this stage. > >> And I thought that this was a team competition. >> >> http://www.flickr.com/groups/wikipedia_loves_art/ >> >> "Shoot on your own or create a small team (10 people, tops) and >> sign-up online (posted soon)." > >Yes I forgot that bit, you can also do it in a team if you prefer. > >> Is the V & A competition a solo effort? > >No. It's a bit complicated and personally I feel like I'm being pulled >in all directions! The project is being organised by the Brooklyn >Museum in New York, who have asked other museums to get involved. >Pharos is coordinating the wikipedia side in New York and globally; >the V&A are organising (although I'm not sure exactly what at this >stage) the London launch event on 1st Feb and my job is to advertise >the London event among the WP community and get as many people along >as possible! > >Points will be added up and prizes given to the different teams who >participate at the different museums. > >Hope that's a little clearer! > >Andrew > >______
Yes, loads. Good luck. Gordo -- "Think Feynman"///////// http://pobox.com/~gordo/ [email protected]/// _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
