2009/8/11 geni <geni...@gmail.com>: > 2009/8/10 Michael Peel <em...@mikepeel.net>: >> Hi all, >> >> Anyone interested in the below? As I understand it, they want to >> cover the range of philosophies on Wikipedia - they already have >> people involved with an inclusionist or middle-ist point of view, but >> no-one from a deletionist viewpoint. >> >> Thanks, >> Mike > > Could be tricky. Classic deletionism is largely a spent force to the > point where the deletion/inclusion argument isn't anywhere near the > conflict it used to be. What do they need from those who take part? > Heh I would still tend to identify as a deletionist but for somewhat > different reasons than classic deletionism.
That's what I was thinking - there are very few people that actually fall neatly into one of those categories. If they portray Wikipedia as having a deletion/inclusion divide it will be rather misleading. We've pretty much reached a consensus on what it means to be notable, it's just how to apply that to individual cases that gives us material for our much loved dramas. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
