I disagree Aubrey - I feel that in no case work item and edition item should be merged into one. They are deeply different entities, and they deserve a specific ID (IMHO).
Alex brollo 2014/1/17 Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> > A good example: Treasure Island from Roberl Luis Stevenson > > We have the "work" here: > Treasure Island > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q185118 > in the item, we have a property called "edition", which links to 2 > different items: > * Treasure Island (1883, Cassell & Company) > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q14944007 > * Treasure Island (1911, Charles Scribner's Sons) > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q14944010 > > I would say that this is a good model: we have the item for the first > edition too, for books that important. > > For the majority of books (those who don't have important translations or > different editions), "work" and "edition" level could be merged in the > same, unique item. > > Of course, wiki-style: if you want a different item, you just create it. > The basic level is a single item. > > What do you say? > Do we agree on this? > > Aubrey > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
