IMHO it's a matter of "data cleaness" to prevent human mistakes. The most common case is an apparent one-to-one relationshio between works and editions, but there is an underlying one-to-many relationship; from my small experience about database good rules, invariably problems pop up when database structure is designed for "simpler case" as soon as a previous one-to-one relationship turns into a one-to-many one (in our case, when a second edition must be added to the first one).
Alex 2014/1/17 Nicolas VIGNERON <[email protected]> > > 2014/1/17 Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> > >> Mmm, but sometimes you have a book with just one edition. >> That case is of course a single item, or no? >> >> Aubrey >> > > I tend to agree with Aubrey : most of the books (but maybe not the most > importants) have just one single edition. I'm wrong ? > > Cdlt, ~nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
