Mmm, but sometimes you have a book with just one edition. That case is of course a single item, or no?
Aubrey On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Alex Brollo <[email protected]> wrote: > I disagree Aubrey - I feel that in no case work item and edition item > should be merged into one. They are deeply different entities, and they > deserve a specific ID (IMHO). > > Alex brollo > > > 2014/1/17 Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> > >> A good example: Treasure Island from Roberl Luis Stevenson >> >> We have the "work" here: >> Treasure Island >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q185118 >> in the item, we have a property called "edition", which links to 2 >> different items: >> * Treasure Island (1883, Cassell & Company) >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q14944007 >> * Treasure Island (1911, Charles Scribner's Sons) >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q14944010 >> >> I would say that this is a good model: we have the item for the first >> edition too, for books that important. >> >> For the majority of books (those who don't have important translations or >> different editions), "work" and "edition" level could be merged in the >> same, unique item. >> >> Of course, wiki-style: if you want a different item, you just create it. >> The basic level is a single item. >> >> What do you say? >> Do we agree on this? >> >> Aubrey >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
