I'm wondering: In Wikisource, we use 3 different namespaces for a book + Index: for the Index page | + Page: for all the pages. | together, they make the "proofreading" version of the book. + ns:0 for the textual version.
As far as I know, there is no linking between all the pages that make a book. There is no "structure" that says "these are 320 Page pages linked to Index:BOOK.djvu". Is that maybe something useful, that we want to address via Wikidata? Or was it the unused BookManager extension that Molly wrote two years ago? https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:BookManagerv2 Aubrey On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:51 AM, David Cuenca Tudela <[email protected]> wrote: > It is true that {{Authority control}} does not need arbitrary item access, > so we can assume that it is already mainstream, although it would be nice > to bring it to all Wikisources > > Regarding badges, I agree with Aubrey that we should reuse the current > levels, not only for pages, but also for texts. From the usability point of > view, I don't think that it is a good idea to use percentage numbers as > badge labels, since the numbers are not descriptive, instead I would go for: > - incomplete text > - not proofread > - proofread > - validated > > Remember that a page can have more than two badges, so for instance a book > with some missing pages could have been "validated" and be an "incomplete > text". That is probably fine. > > Any other comments? Or shall we apply for the wikisource badges already? > > Thanks > Micru > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> 2015-06-01 18:35 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <[email protected]>: >> >>> On 1 June 2015 at 16:47, David Cuenca Tudela <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Arbitrary access has been enabled in all Wikisources, is anybody doing >>> > anything with it that can be replicated in all Wikisources? >>> >>> {{Authority control}} would be a good use case - we already have >>> plenty of experience - and reusable code - in multiple Wikipedias. >>> >>> Happy to advise further if needed. >>> >> >> Does {{Authority control}} use Wikidata arbitrary access ? (I don't think >> so… but not sure). >> Nonetheless, This template already exists on 8 Wikisources (according to >> Wikidata maybe some are missing) and works fine. It should definitively be >> use on all Wikisources. >> >> The template Author could maybe benefit from Wikidata arbitrary access >> (again not sure, user:Rical works on Modèle:Auteur on fr.ws but I can't >> understand his coding) >> (by the way, is it normal/a good idea to have this template on >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5615832 mixed with the wikipedia infobox >> ?) >> >> Cdlt, ~nicolas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> >> > > > -- > Etiamsi omnes, ego non > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
