Not certain about these as badges and would rather hasten slowly see what they look like, get feedback prior to launching further. I was more trying to identify some of the arbitrary components that you want to be able to pull.
In the end to identify when an Index: flicks to validated, that the system could be able to then identify that a work has now should be 'promoted' to complete for the main ns would be magic, and ultimately have the tweet go out through twitter of that news. From there that people can wander through related works in a list, etc. is value. I need better thinking time, and inspiration time. Definitely that we may poke at the WMAU crowd if their conference gets off the ground in October. Regards, Billinghurst On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:16 AM, David Cuenca Tudela <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Billinghurst, > Good idea about the "featured works", I will add it to the list. Regarding > "proofread of the (timeperiod)" it seems something better managed locally in > wiki, maybe with a category. > > Listings of authors, institutions, publisers, etc is something that should > be possible to do once the queries are available. > > Should we add a badge for "Suporting scan available"? Or can we just assume > that if the item has the property "scan file (Commons)(P996)" then it is a > book with a scan? > > Regards, > - Micru > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:06 PM, billinghurst <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> There are numbers of badges that I would consider >> * Featured works >> * Proofread of the (timeperiod), for enWS it is one a month >> >> Ultimately I am looking to have to have Wikidata to populate/build >> listings of authors, eg. >> https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Authors-D >> and >> https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Portal:British_Museum >> and >> https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Portal:British_Museum (staff as authors >> bit) >> >> Re states of works, Proofread, Validated (sure), though less need for >> not proofread, as I wonder whether it warrants noting. Definitely not >> percentages. Whether a work's validation is supported by a scanned >> text. >> >> I know that enWS would like to be able to generate a list of works by >> month of validation by automated process, and you can do more >> decoratively with scan images, text, author name, blah blah though >> drawing information by arbitrary data pulls. >> >> Regards, Billinghurst >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:47 AM, David Cuenca Tudela <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Arbitrary access has been enabled in all Wikisources, is anybody doing >> > anything with it that can be replicated in all Wikisources? >> > >> > And regarding badges, there is this ticket open: >> > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T97014 >> > >> > Which badges do we need in Wikidata? I was thinking of: >> > - Proofread >> > - Validated >> > - Export ready >> > >> > Any thoughts on this? Can they be filled up by bot? >> > >> > Thanks >> > Micru >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wikisource-l mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > > > > > -- > Etiamsi omnes, ego non > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
