I think citation templates would be a good use case for arbitrary access on Wikisource. Is anyone working on this? d.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm wondering: > In Wikisource, we use 3 different namespaces for a book > + Index: for the Index page | > + Page: for all the pages. | together, they make the "proofreading" > version of the book. > + ns:0 for the textual version. > > As far as I know, there is no linking between all the pages that make a > book. > There is no "structure" that says "these are 320 Page pages linked to > Index:BOOK.djvu". > > Is that maybe something useful, that we want to address via Wikidata? > Or was it the unused BookManager extension that Molly wrote two years ago? > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:BookManagerv2 > > Aubrey > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:51 AM, David Cuenca Tudela <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> It is true that {{Authority control}} does not need arbitrary item access, >> so we can assume that it is already mainstream, although it would be nice to >> bring it to all Wikisources >> >> Regarding badges, I agree with Aubrey that we should reuse the current >> levels, not only for pages, but also for texts. From the usability point of >> view, I don't think that it is a good idea to use percentage numbers as >> badge labels, since the numbers are not descriptive, instead I would go for: >> - incomplete text >> - not proofread >> - proofread >> - validated >> >> Remember that a page can have more than two badges, so for instance a book >> with some missing pages could have been "validated" and be an "incomplete >> text". That is probably fine. >> >> Any other comments? Or shall we apply for the wikisource badges already? >> >> Thanks >> Micru >> >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> 2015-06-01 18:35 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> On 1 June 2015 at 16:47, David Cuenca Tudela <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Arbitrary access has been enabled in all Wikisources, is anybody doing >>>> > anything with it that can be replicated in all Wikisources? >>>> >>>> {{Authority control}} would be a good use case - we already have >>>> plenty of experience - and reusable code - in multiple Wikipedias. >>>> >>>> Happy to advise further if needed. >>> >>> >>> Does {{Authority control}} use Wikidata arbitrary access ? (I don't think >>> so… but not sure). >>> Nonetheless, This template already exists on 8 Wikisources (according to >>> Wikidata maybe some are missing) and works fine. It should definitively be >>> use on all Wikisources. >>> >>> The template Author could maybe benefit from Wikidata arbitrary access >>> (again not sure, user:Rical works on Modèle:Auteur on fr.ws but I can't >>> understand his coding) >>> (by the way, is it normal/a good idea to have this template on >>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5615832 mixed with the wikipedia infobox ?) >>> >>> Cdlt, ~nicolas >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikisource-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Etiamsi omnes, ego non >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
