Not right now, as far as I know. Of course, two of the main use of arbitrary access are the possibility of retrieving * author metadata * book metadata
and use them where you need. For example, Ricordisamoa is doing some experiment here: https://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Utente:Ricordisamoa/sandbox Pay attention to the dates, and then go in Edit mode: you'll see that he put a "Wikidata" element, and in that the value is the Wikidata item for Alessandro Manzoni. This retrieves the birth date and death date from the item. We could rewrite all our Author modules in Lua for authors, and put all our authors in Wikidata. That is probably the first thing we should do. Aubrey On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Daniel Mietchen < [email protected]> wrote: > I think citation templates would be a good use case for arbitrary > access on Wikisource. Is anyone working on this? > d. > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm wondering: > > In Wikisource, we use 3 different namespaces for a book > > + Index: for the Index page | > > + Page: for all the pages. | together, they make the "proofreading" > > version of the book. > > + ns:0 for the textual version. > > > > As far as I know, there is no linking between all the pages that make a > > book. > > There is no "structure" that says "these are 320 Page pages linked to > > Index:BOOK.djvu". > > > > Is that maybe something useful, that we want to address via Wikidata? > > Or was it the unused BookManager extension that Molly wrote two years > ago? > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:BookManagerv2 > > > > Aubrey > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:51 AM, David Cuenca Tudela <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> It is true that {{Authority control}} does not need arbitrary item > access, > >> so we can assume that it is already mainstream, although it would be > nice to > >> bring it to all Wikisources > >> > >> Regarding badges, I agree with Aubrey that we should reuse the current > >> levels, not only for pages, but also for texts. From the usability > point of > >> view, I don't think that it is a good idea to use percentage numbers as > >> badge labels, since the numbers are not descriptive, instead I would go > for: > >> - incomplete text > >> - not proofread > >> - proofread > >> - validated > >> > >> Remember that a page can have more than two badges, so for instance a > book > >> with some missing pages could have been "validated" and be an > "incomplete > >> text". That is probably fine. > >> > >> Any other comments? Or shall we apply for the wikisource badges already? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Micru > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 2015-06-01 18:35 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <[email protected]>: > >>>> > >>>> On 1 June 2015 at 16:47, David Cuenca Tudela <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Arbitrary access has been enabled in all Wikisources, is anybody > doing > >>>> > anything with it that can be replicated in all Wikisources? > >>>> > >>>> {{Authority control}} would be a good use case - we already have > >>>> plenty of experience - and reusable code - in multiple Wikipedias. > >>>> > >>>> Happy to advise further if needed. > >>> > >>> > >>> Does {{Authority control}} use Wikidata arbitrary access ? (I don't > think > >>> so… but not sure). > >>> Nonetheless, This template already exists on 8 Wikisources (according > to > >>> Wikidata maybe some are missing) and works fine. It should > definitively be > >>> use on all Wikisources. > >>> > >>> The template Author could maybe benefit from Wikidata arbitrary access > >>> (again not sure, user:Rical works on Modèle:Auteur on fr.ws but I > can't > >>> understand his coding) > >>> (by the way, is it normal/a good idea to have this template on > >>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5615832 mixed with the wikipedia > infobox ?) > >>> > >>> Cdlt, ~nicolas > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Wikisource-l mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Etiamsi omnes, ego non > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikisource-l mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikisource-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
