Yes I agree - totally wonderful. And there are more ways to make a more meaningful query out of this (In Dutch #1 is Barbapapa and in English the Simpsons take 1st place), by either specifying it can'be a film, or just filtering for inception date before 1970
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected] > wrote: > Hoi, > Classification as we have it is a wonder. It is there and it cannot be > explained. It does serve a purpose though. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 11 April 2017 at 12:44, Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Interesting query, thanks! How odd that "sitcom" is a subclass of >> "literary work"! I never thought of it that way :) >> >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Magnus Manske < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The 500 most important (as in, number of Wiki sitelinks) literary works >>> that are (at least partially) in "original language" German, according to >>> Wikidata: >>> http://tinyurl.com/mzhd8na >>> "The Big Bang Theory" item might need some review, but the rest look >>> good... >>> Just change the Q188 and the language code for your favourite language! >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:58 AM Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In it.source we made a similar Canon: >>>> https://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Canone_delle_opere >>>> _della_letteratura_italiana >>>> >>>> Ideally, we should have an item (a "work" item, so basically the one >>>> with a Wikipedia article) on Wikidata for each one. >>>> Than we can count how many Wikipedias have an article on it. Basically >>>> it's Tpt's idea using wikidata and sitelinks. >>>> >>>> Aubrey >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Jane Darnell <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> You can always start with the lists per country (if they exist). So for >>>> example I made an article about the first 500 of such a "1000 most >>>> important works of literature" list compiled for the Netherlands here: >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_of_Dutch_Literature >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Thomas PT <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> A maybe simpler metric: the top 1000 Wikipedia articles about works per >>>> page view. >>>> >>>> Thomas >>>> >>>> > Le 11 avr. 2017 à 09:42, mathieu stumpf guntz < >>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>> > >>>> > Hi Nemo, >>>> > >>>> > We may establish a list a the "1000 works that every Wikisource >>>> should have" (with translation possibly needed). >>>> > >>>> > What metric could we use to define such a list? Maybe reference >>>> frequency, but it requires statistics whose availability is unknown to me. >>>> > >>>> > Statistically, >>>> > psychoslave >>>> > >>>> > Le 29/03/2017 à 08:30, Federico Leva (Nemo) a écrit : >>>> >> One issue sometimes raised about Wikisource is how we know that >>>> we're working on the "right" books. Internet Archive is planning to >>>> textbooks starting from those which are most frequently assigned in USA >>>> schools: >>>> >> http://blog.archive.org/2017/03/29/books-donated-for-macarth >>>> ur-foundation-100change-challenge-from-bookmooch-users/ >>>> >> >>>> >> I was surprised to learn a project like OpenSyllabus exists and >>>> works, I emailed them to ask what it would take to do the same for other >>>> languages/geographies. >>>> >> >>>> >> Nemo >>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> Wikisource-l mailing list >>>> >> [email protected] >>>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Wikisource-l mailing list >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikisource-l mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikisource-l mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikisource-l mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikisource-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
