On 20/07/2010 16:25, Jeroen De Dauw wrote: > Hey, > > That would be completely awesome!
Yes, that would help a lot, although it might be appropriate to still auto-defer reviews for some extensions in this queue, depending on whether or not enough reviewing happens for them (calling an extension "Semantic..." does not imply that SMW developers will review it ;-). Markus > > Cheers > > -- > Jeroen De Dauw > * http://blog.bn2vs.com > * http://wiki.bn2vs.com > Don't panic. Don't be evil. 50 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 6D 69 6E 67 20 34 20 6C 69 > 66 65! > -- > > > On 20 July 2010 17:20, Max Semenik<[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 20.07.2010, 17:20 Chad wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jeroen De Dauw<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> About the semantic extensions: >>>> >>>> It would actually be nice if they did not get marked deferred at all, >> and be >>>> reviewed by people that are familiar with them to some extend. I'm >> willing >>>> to do that for all commits not made by myself. Assuming this would not >>>> interfere to much with WMF code review of course :) >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >> >>> If someone's going to start doing code review, that's fine. They've >>> just all been getting deferred because nobody's been reviewing >>> them so far. >> >> We could create a separate review queue for it. >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]]) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
