2010/7/21 Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]>: > It strikes me that a better solution is to fix whatever tools we're > using to determine what still needs to be reviewed. If someone is > checking all revisions marked as "new" and needs to mark things they > won't review as "deferred" to get them off the list, maybe they should > instead be checking all revisions marked as "new" from particular > paths. Then explicit deferral will not be necessary, and projects > like SMW can go ahead and use Code Review at their own pace without > annoying anyone else. > As far as I know, this is exactly what happens in reality.
As I discussed with a few others at Wikimania, it'd be nice to take this one step further and allow multiple people to sign off on a revision, possibly with various types of sign-off, like: * I read the diff and it looks good * I tested this and seems to work * I reviewed the niche part of this rev that I'm an expert on * I am Tim Starling and I approve this message^Hrevision * ... Roan Kattouw (Catrope) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
