Hey,

I'm also fine either way. So if no separate queue is set up, I'd appropriate
it if the semantic* commits where not marked as deferred from now on.

Cheers

--
Jeroen De Dauw
* http://blog.bn2vs.com
* http://wiki.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil. 50 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 6D 69 6E 67 20 34 20 6C 69
66 65!
--


On 21 July 2010 14:47, Chad <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Roan Kattouw <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > 2010/7/21 Chad <[email protected]>:
> >> I'm also not sure how Code Review will handle a repository handling a
> >> subset of another
> >> repository. I'm pretty sure things will be ok, I only imagine it would
> >> just duplicate data
> >> (revs for SMW stuff would be imported for both repos). Still should be
> >> tested first though.
> >> Then we would need someone with repoadmin rights to set this up, I
> >> believe Brion or
> >> Tim can.
> >>
> > Why would you want to do this? With the path search feature, it's
> > extremely easy to pull up a list of revs touching a certain extension.
> > I really don't see why the SMW review queue has to be separate from
> > the main MW review queue on a technical level; of course it would be
> > on a personal level, in that different people review different things,
> > but we have that already for e.g. UsabilityInitiative. In practical
> > terms, people who are familiar with the SMW codebase would start
> > reviewing SMW revisions through our existing CodeReview setup, and the
> > only thing we would have to do on a technical level is make sure those
> > paths don't get auto-deferred.
> >
> > Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> >
>
> I agree with you here. They were just suggesting another route.
> Honestly, I don't really care either way :) The fix in r69675 is
> generally useful though, if repositories were segemented in that
> manner.
>
> -Chad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to