2010/7/21 Chad <[email protected]>: > I'm also not sure how Code Review will handle a repository handling a > subset of another > repository. I'm pretty sure things will be ok, I only imagine it would > just duplicate data > (revs for SMW stuff would be imported for both repos). Still should be > tested first though. > Then we would need someone with repoadmin rights to set this up, I > believe Brion or > Tim can. > Why would you want to do this? With the path search feature, it's extremely easy to pull up a list of revs touching a certain extension. I really don't see why the SMW review queue has to be separate from the main MW review queue on a technical level; of course it would be on a personal level, in that different people review different things, but we have that already for e.g. UsabilityInitiative. In practical terms, people who are familiar with the SMW codebase would start reviewing SMW revisions through our existing CodeReview setup, and the only thing we would have to do on a technical level is make sure those paths don't get auto-deferred.
Roan Kattouw (Catrope) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
