On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Rob Lanphier <[email protected]> wrote: > ...snip... > This seems like a real problem. If Jack wants someone to review his > code, should he simply move it back from "deferred" to "new"? What > criteria are used to mark something as "deferred" in the first place? > I'm assuming it's currently standard practice to mark extensions that > aren't slated for deployment by WMF as "deferred"; do I have that > right? > > Rob See http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_Review and http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_review_guide -Peachey
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
