On 14/11/10 20:58, Jack Phoenix wrote: <snip> > The deployment queue is already long enough and people who are reviewing > code for Wikimedia deployment are having a hard time catching up; I don't > want to make their work any more difficult than it already is, I just want > to have my extensions reviewed to make sure that no glaring errors or > security vulnerabilities slip in.
Hello Jack, I always apply a path filter when browsing the code review backlog. It means I only see *new* revisions in the */trunk/phase3* path (or the CodeReview extensions). Revision for your extensions can have any status (defered, new, reverted, ok, fixme), it is not that I do not care : I will simply not see them in the backlog! If you care about your extension code quality, I think we should marks its deferred revisions as 'new' and start reviewing it. This way, if we ever want to enable it on WMF servers, we will avoid the "later, it is not reviewed" drama. cheers, -- Ashar Voultoiz _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
