I am not following this line of reasoning: how can adding guidance / instructions on how to write a good bug report turn people away? In a previous life, I have studied the factors that shorten the time required to fix a big. Bugreports that contain steps to reproduce are a significant predictor to shorten the time to fix a bug. You can find the paper here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1507233
A systematic lack of replies is also an issue but this solution was not aimed at fixing that problem. On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Bryan Tong Minh <[email protected]>wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Diederik van Liere <[email protected]> > wrote: > > So maybe we can paste these 5 steps (or something similar) in the initial > > form used to file a bugreport. > > > > This would increase the quality of bugreports and make it easier for bug > > triaging. > > > Increase the quality perhaps, but also increase the the barrier of > reporting bugs, and that is something that is not very good imho. > I don't think we have a systematic problem with bad bug reports. The > systematic problem is the lack of replies from developers. > > > Bryan > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > -- <a href="http://about.me/diederik">Check out my about.me profile!</a> _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
