----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony" <[email protected]>

> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Aryeh Gregor
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You can still link it with proprietary code as long as you don't
> > distribute the result, so it would be fine for research projects or
> > similar that rely on proprietary components.
> 
> What happens if one of your employees or volunteers distributes the
> result?

I don't believe there's any GPL caselaw on "span of adminstrative control".

> > You can always *use* GPLd code however you like.
> 
> Does "use" include "prepare a derivative work"?

As long as you don't distribute it, sure.  The GPL was, is, and will
always be *a license to distribute*.  GPL doesn't even forbid you to 
modify and make available as a web app; you need to release under AGPL
if you want to restrict that.

> > If you want to *distribute* proprietary
> > (or otherwise GPL-incompatible) code that depends on my volunteer
> > contributions, I'm happy to tell you to go jump off a bridge.
> 
> Copyright law gives the author an exclusive right to *prepare*
> derivative works, not just to *distribute* derivative works. What in
> the GPL gives you permission to prepare a proprietary derivative work
> which you do not distribute?

Citation?  Note that such a citation must take into account whether 
there's any *use* in so doing in a non-computer-code environment.

Cheers,
-- jra

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to