"Dynamic linking" implies we have something to dynamically link in the first place. A parser library consisting of compiled PHP in this particular case.
Let's just cross this hypothetical bridge when we come to it, shall we? - Trevor On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Bryan Tong Minh > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we stop discussing this issue? I believe that most MediaWiki > > developers are in fact not interested in changing the status quo with > > regards to licensing, so there is no point in discussing it. > > That there isn't going to be a license change is exactly *why* it > needs to be discussed. If dynamic linking is fine, then a dynamically > linked library is appropriate. On the other hand, if it isn't (or, at > least, if it's not clear that it is), then something more like gzip > would be better. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
