On 27 June 2012 14:38, Petr Kadlec <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27 June 2012 13:33, Achim Flammenkamp <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2) I wonder why the SVG-graphic devolpers use such an "improper"(?) >> rendering- >> philosophy. All these articfacts on the Iran-flag would have been avoided, if >> the rendering is divided up logical into two steps: Firstly render the >> SVG-code >> to the size given in this SVG-code (or an integer multiple for large final >> sizes) to a pixel (discret) map.
I can imagine how this can be a problem. Thin lines than in your original render have 1 pixel width, will be removed or suffer a strong antialias wen reduced down. Re-rendering a image on a smaller resolution will result on a pixel perfect image (except thick eyebrows), where 1 pixel width is still 1 pixel. (no related) http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php?#liquid-rescale > > Technical remark: The width/height specified in the SVG file is a > generic “length” value [1], which can be in other units than pixels > [2] and also can take non-integral values. [3] > ...and the situation is even more complex than that. So more things that thing can go wrong. -- -- ℱin del ℳensaje. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
