> I can imagine how this can be a problem. Thin lines than in your
> original render have 1 pixel width, will be removed or suffer a strong
you misunderstood. In the original SVG there are no thin lines. The thin
line was introduced/inserted by buggy down-rendering to the wanted size.
(There are coincident lines in the SVG).
> antialias wen reduced down.
> Re-rendering a image on a smaller resolution will result on a pixel
> perfect image (except thick eyebrows), where 1 pixel width is still 1
> pixel.
Also the double drawing would be mostly irrelvant, if first render to the
original given SVG size. It seems many problems are only introduced artifically
by this toughtless(?) rendering-philosophy of RSVG (or Imakemagic), IMHO. :-/

> ...and the situation is even more complex than that. So more things
> that thing can go wrong.
Surely

Achim

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to