On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:36:50PM -0700, Rob Lanphier wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Faidon Liambotis > <[email protected]>wrote: > > My understanding of the process was that we would collect a broad set of > > arguments/ideas/proposals and people would be later assigned to the task > > of evaluating them and proposing a viable solution and a migration path > > (or not, and propose that we stay with Gerrit). > > > > Yes, we're seeking a broad range of proposals. However, "proposals" is the > key word. That means looking the requirements, reading the website and > matching against those requirements, and stitching together something that > at least looks good on paper. I'm not expecting anyone to set up a > prototype, but I am asking that, given how long we've been talking about > this, that we narrow down our options a bit to the things that we know are > worth looking at rather than (still, a year later) having the "have you > looked at this?" discussion again.
I think GitLab looks promising but I'm unable to judge it against all of our requirements just from the online demo and without spending some amount of time on it. I just put some pros and cons as I see them to the Wiki page and hope it can be considered. Regards, Faidon _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
