On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Chris McMahon <cmcma...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Rob Lanphier <ro...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> >> I think our best mitigation strategy is to do as good a job as we possibly >> can integrating Gerrit with GitHub, combined with other improvements to >> Gerrit. >> >> > One thing I don't think has been explicitly said yet, although Brion hinted > at it early on is the nature of the gerrit-github integration. Gerrit > serves the required workflow well for things like core and key extensions > and puppet, so having changes made via gerrit reflected in a github view is > great for outsiders to explore and experiment. > > But it would also be great, especially for certain types of community > contributions, if we could approve pull requests from github and have those > reflected in gerrit. > > I realize this is all hand-wavy and stuff, but as Brion pointed out, it's > all git. With some thought behind the design, a two-way integration > between gerrit and github seems like it would be possible and useful. >
Yes, I agree wholeheartedly. The main reason I've been holding off on doing the replication yet is that the replication system was split off to a plugin for 2.5, so I was pretty much waiting on 2.5 to land so I didn't have to set it up twice. Once we've got 2.5 running, this will become a *top* priority for me in our Gerrit setup. Pulling stuff back in is probably doable (and I've heard rumors it's been done), but will require more investment. -Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
