On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Christian Aistleitner <christ...@quelltextlich.at> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:28:25PM -0700, Rob Lanphier wrote: >> The Bugzilla-based solution has some of the advantages of the >> MediaWiki-based solution. We may be able to implement it more quickly >> than something native to Gerrit because we're already working on >> Bugzilla integration, and we get features like queries for free, as >> well as the minor convenience of not having to have a new database >> table or two to manage. > > The problem at this point is that the gerrit-plugin interface is > rather new, and that shows at various ends: > * It's not possible to add GUI elements from a plugin. > * Plugins cannot add their own database tables through gerrit. > [...] > > So whatever we could possibly get into upstream gerrit, we should > really try to get into upstream and not put into the plugin. > > But thinking about whether gerrit or bugzilla would be the correct > place to store those tags ... > It seems to me that the tags are not really tied to issues or changes, > but rather to commits... > Wouldn't "git notes" be a good match [1]?
+1 rupert _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
